Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Crump v. Central Office, et al
as 26-1088
Plaintiff:
NORVELL WEBSTER CRUMP
Defendant:
CENTRAL OFFICE, NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE, ADMINISTRATIVE MAXIMUM and others
Crump v. Connors, et al
as 26-1041
Plaintiff:
NORVELL WEBSTER CRUMP
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR, UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICES, Supervised release, NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE and others
Crump v. Central Office, et al
as 26-1034
Plaintiff:
NORVELL WEBSTER CRUMP
Defendant:
CENTRAL OFFICE, NORTH CENTRAL REGIONAL OFFICE, ADMINISTRATIVE MAXIMUM and others
Crump (PS) v. Administrative Remedy Coordinator Control Office et al
as 1:2025cv03427
Plaintiff:
Norvell Crump and Norvell Webster Crump
Defendant:
Administrative Remedy Coordinator Control Office, Warden, United States Probation Offices and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffery Cowgill v. James Shipman, et al
as 25-1542
Plaintiff:
Jeffery S. Cowgill
Defendant:
James Shipman, Warden, Maximum Security Unit, Maurice Culclager, Deputy Warden, Maximum Security Unit, Shelby Houston, Lieutenant, Maximum Security Unit and others
Crump (PS) v. USA et al
as 1:2025cv00719
Plaintiff:
Norvell Crump
Defendant:
USA, A. Ciolli, Coastal Raze Regional Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crump v. United States, et al
as 25-1041
Plaintiff:
NORVELL WEBSTER CRUMP
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, E. CORTER, Warden, EUGENE BLIME, Supervisory attorney and others
Crump (PS) v. USA et al
as 1:2024cv03305
Defendant:
E. Corter, USA, Corndis and others
Plaintiff:
Norvell Webster Crump
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crump v. Ciolli, et al
as 24-1420
Petitioner:
NORVELL WEBSTER CRUMP
Respondent:
C. HARVEY, ADMINISTRATIVE MAXIMUM, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Crump v. United States, et al
as 24-1332
Respondent:
REGIONAL OFFICE, ADMINISTRATIONS CUSTODIAN, N. DOMINGUEZ and others
Petitioner:
NORVELL WEBSTER CRUMP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
