Cases 1 - 10 of 110
Isajczuk v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Adrian Jan Isajczuk
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin J O'Malley and Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MASCHO v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00241
Petitioner:
ADRIAN MASCHO
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
THOMAS v. KOHL'S, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv02312
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN THOMAS
Defendant:
KOHL'S, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
EDWARDS v. MERSHON et al
as 1:2023cv01539
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN EDWARDS
Defendant:
JOHN MERSHON and VERNON OSBURN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRANCIS v. PLASSE et al
as 2:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
DONALD FRANCIS
Defendant:
JOHN PLASSE, CHARLEY FUNK, CASEY LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephens v. Ball
as 3:2023cv00163
Plaintiff:
Dorian Stephens and Dorian Gray Stephens
Defendant:
Adrianne Ball, A Ball and Adrian Ball
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES et al
as 1:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
LE'MERE JONES
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES, SARAH BEDWELL, BOBBI RIGGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Harber et al
as 1:2022cv00455
Plaintiff:
Adrian Johnson
Defendant:
Harber and Franke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EDWARDS v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2022cv02357
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN EDWARDS
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DAUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EDWARDS v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2022cv02377
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN EDWARDS
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER JR., DAUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
