Cases 11 - 20 of 52
Cargle v. Henry County Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2020cv00340
Defendant:
Henry County Department of Adult Supervision and Henry County Adult Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Steven Lee Cargle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Cobb Co Adult Detention Center
as 1:2019cv05811
Defendant:
Cobb Co Adult Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Michael Shawn Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher v. Cobb County Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2019cv04079
Defendant:
David Sanders, Sheriff Neil Warren, David Marshall and others
Plaintiff:
Lord James Christopher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Cobb County Adult Detention Center
as 1:2019cv03114
Plaintiff:
Justin Alan Jones
Defendant:
Cobb County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ible v. Warren et al
as 1:2017cv05480
Plaintiff:
Dion T. Ible
Defendant:
Neil Warren and Cobb County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harper v. Floyd County Adult Detention Center
as 4:2017cv00242
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Labron Harper
Defendant:
Floyd County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ible v. Cobb County Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2017cv03183
Plaintiff:
Dion T. Ible
Defendant:
Cobb County Adult Detention Center and N. Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Cobb County Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2017cv02795
Plaintiff:
Craig A. Jordan
Defendant:
Cobb County Adult Detention Center, Lops and Carriker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cochran v. Gwinnett County Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2017cv02438
Plaintiff:
Chadwick Edward Cochran
Defendant:
Gwinnett County Adult Detention Center, US Prisoner Transport, Noles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vickers v. Handy et al
as 1:2017cv01518
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Vickers
Respondent:
Patricia Handy, Cobb County Adult Detention Center, GA Regional Atlanta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
