Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Endres v. Moody et al
as 1:2023cv12051
Plaintiff: Steven P. Endres and Pro se litigant Steven P. Endres
Defendant: Ashley Moody, Ken Paxton, City and County of San Francisco, California and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Oshana v. AER Lingus Limited We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02041
Plaintiff: Mary Oshana
Defendant: Aer Lingus Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Schubek v. Aer Lingus Limited We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv01955
Plaintiff: Alexander Schubek
Defendant: Aer Lingus Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scordo v. Aer Lingus Limited
as 2:2018cv06804
Plaintiff: Anne Scordo
Defendant: Aer Lingus Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Loughlin v. Aier Lingus, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv10543
Plaintiff: John Loughlin
Defendant: Aer Lingus, Inc and Aer Lingus Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rosenberg et al v. Aer Lingus Limited
as 1:2016cv05774
Defendant: Aer Lingus Limited
Plaintiff: Nancy Rosenberg and Robert Rosenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Bissie v. Aer Lingus Limited
as 1:2015cv04892
Defendant: Aer Lingus Limited
Plaintiff: Vanessa Bissie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Beaven et al v. AER Lingus Limited
as 3:2015cv00952
Plaintiff: Douglas Beaven and Heather Beaven
Defendant: AER Lingus Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coppens v. Aer Lingus Limited We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv06597
Defendant: Aer Lingus Limited
Plaintiff: Sade Coppens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Narkewicz-Laine v. Aer Lingus Group Public Limited et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv50098
Plaintiff: Christian Narkewicz-Laine
Defendant: AER Lingus Group Public Limited and Aer Lingus Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?