Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Johnson v. Zuckerberg et al
as 3:2023cv03910
Plaintiff:
Tyler D. Johnson
Defendant:
Mark Zuckerberg, Sheryl Sandberg, Cambridge Analytica and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrew Albert v. Oshkosh Corporation, et al
as 21-2789
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW ALBERT
Defendant / Appellee:
OSHKOSH CORPORATION, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE OSHKOSH CORPORATION, ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE OF THE OSHKOSH CORPORATION AND AFFILIATES EMPLOYEES BENEFIT PLANS and others
Albert v. Oshkosh Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00901
Defendant:
The Board of Directors of the Oshkosh Corporation, Oshkosh Corporation and Administrative Committee of the Oshkosh Corporation and Affiliates Employee Benefit Plans
Plaintiff:
Andrew Albert
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Ketchum-Hallinan v. Nationwide Insurance Companies and Affiliates Employee Healthcare Plan
as 3:2013cv00606
Plaintiff:
Traci A. Ketchum-Hallinan
Defendant:
Nationwide Insurance Companies and Affiliates Employee Healthcare Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Wesson v. Jane Phillips Medical Center & Affiliates Employee Group Health Care Plan, Premium Plan et al
as 4:2009cv00561
Plaintiff:
Susan Wesson
Defendant:
Jane Phillips Medical Center & Affiliates Employee Group Health Care Plan, Premium Plan, BMI-HealthPlans and Jane Phillips Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
DOYLE v. NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANIES & AFFILIATES EMPLOYEE HEALTH CARE PLAN et al
as 2:2008cv01785
Plaintiff:
FRANK J. DOYLE
Defendant:
NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANIES & AFFILIATES EMPLOYEE HEALTH CARE PLAN, PLAN ADMINISTRATOR NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANIES & AFFILIATES EMPLOYEE HEALTH CARE PLAN, BENEFITS ADMINISTRATOR COMMITTEE NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANIES & AFFILIATES EMPLOYEE HEALTH CARE PLAN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
