Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Muzy v. Meijer Stores Limited Partnership et al
as 1:2023cv00110
Plaintiff:
Matthew Muzy
Defendant:
Meijer Stores Limited Partnership, Elijah Vance, Officer Dalton Waidelich and others
Not Classified By Court:
C Erik Chickedantz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Morningstar v. Aguilera et al
as 1:2022cv00273
Plaintiff:
Lance Morningstar
Defendant:
Alexis Aguilera, Michael Bodeker, Whitney A Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morningstar v. Aguilera et al
as 3:2022cv00650
Plaintiff:
Lance Morningstar
Defendant:
Alexis Aguilera, Michael Bodeker, Whitney A Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AGUILERA v. WARDEN
as 1:2020cv02989
Respondent:
WARDEN
Petitioner:
DELFINO AGUILERA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Aguilera v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv00779
Plaintiff:
Araceli Aguilera
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
AGUILERA v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv00768
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
SHANE AGUILERA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RooR International BV et al v. Smoking Angel's Indiana #1 Inc et al
as 2:2019cv00079
Plaintiff:
Sream Inc and RooR International BV
Defendant:
Efrain Aguilera, Smoking Angel's Indiana #1, Inc. d/b/a Low Bob's Discount Tobacco and Smoking Angel's Indiana #1 Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Directv LLC v. Aguilera et al
as 2:2016cv00071
Plaintiff:
Directv LLC
Defendant:
Jorge Aguilera, Patricia Huerta, Rosa Aguilera and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 521
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
