Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Curry v. South Carolina, The State of et al
as 2:2013cv02707
Plaintiff:
Jerome Curry
Defendant:
South Carolina, The State of, Brain Kellett, McDuffie County Dist Atty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wernicke v. J Al Cannon, Jr
as 8:2013cv00148
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Wernicke
Defendant:
J Al Cannon, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Kristopher Dorr v. Ford Motor Company, et al
as 11-1681
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KRISTOPHER DORR
Defendant / Appellee:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, MAZDA MOTOR CORPORATION, AUTO ALLIANCE INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED and others
Frazier v. County of Charleston et al
as 2:2011cv03431
Plaintiff:
James Lamont Frazier
Defendant:
County of Charleston , Charleston County Sheriff's Office , Al Cannon, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Frazier v. County of Charleston et al
as 4:2011cv03431
Plaintiff:
James Lamont Frazier
Defendant:
County of Charleston , Charleston County Sheriff's Office , Al Cannon, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Naarl Richard v. J. Cannon, Jr.
as 11-7364
Petitioner - Appellant:
NAARL RICHARD
Respondent - Appellee:
J. AL CANNON, JR.
Respondent:
MATTHEW J. MODICA, USASC and JAMES R. DUFFY, DEA US
Singleton v. 10 Unidentified US Marshals et al
as 8:2011cv01811
Plaintiff:
Michael A Singleton
Defendant:
10 Unidentified US Marshals, SC, State of, NJ, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Singleton v. 10 Unidentified US Marshals et al
as 2:2011cv01811
Plaintiff:
Michael A Singleton
Defendant:
10 Unidentified US Marshals, SC, State of, NJ, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gorton v. Cannon
as 1:2011cv01744
Petitioner:
William Gorton
Respondent:
J Al Cannon, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Richard v. Immigration and Naturalization Service et al
as 0:2011cv01508
Petitioner:
Naarl Richard
Respondent:
Immigration and Naturalization Service and J Al Cannon, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
