Cases 21 - 30 of 71
Dickerson v. South Carolina, The State of et al
as 1:2017cv03279
Plaintiff:
Ismail Dickerson
Defendant:
South Carolina, The State of, Charleston, County of, Al Cannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Cannon et al
as 6:2017cv02002
Plaintiff:
Craig R Neal
Defendant:
J Al Cannon, Jr and M Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Wright v. Dr. Darby
as 17-6764
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY LAMAR WRIGHT, a/k/a Anthony L. Wright, formerly #250258
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. DARBY, in his individual capacity, DR. RANDOLPH, in her individual capacity, DR. GRANT, in his individual capacity and others
Brown v. Cannon et al
as 8:2017cv00933
Plaintiff:
Leonard C Brown
Defendant:
Al Cannon, Medical CCOH and Lt Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Al Cannon Detention Center et al
as 6:2017cv00773
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Wright
Defendant:
Al Cannon Detention Center and Carolina Center of Occupational Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Cannon et al
as 1:2016cv03732
Plaintiff:
Lucas Ward
Defendant:
Al Cannon, J. Phillips and D. Homer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARD v. CANNON et al
as 1:2016cv02122
Plaintiff:
LUCAS WARD
Defendant:
AL CANNON, J. PHILLIPS and D. HOMER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynolds v. Cannon et al
as 1:2016cv00512
Plaintiff:
Nathanael Lenard Reynolds
Defendant:
Al Cannon, Luke and Officer Habersham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynolds v. Cannon et al
as 2:2016cv00512
Plaintiff:
Nathanael Lenard Reynolds
Defendant:
Al Cannon , Luke and Officer Habersham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Frasier v. Carolina Ctr for Occup. Health
as 16-1114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES LAMAR FRASIER
Defendant - Appellee:
CAROLINA CENTER FOR OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CHARLESTON, CHARLESTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, AL CANNON, JR., in his official capacity as Sheriff of Charleston County and others
Party-in-Interest:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
