Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Abbas Khafaji v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-3551
Petitioner:
Abbas Ater Ali Al Khafaji
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Al Khafaji et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 5:2023cv01198
Plaintiff:
Nisreen Sahib Al Khafaji and Dhufr Jawad Farhan
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou and Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
AL-KHAFAJI v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2023cv00586
Plaintiff:
AHMED AL-KHAFAJI
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU, MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00471
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01945
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Al Khafaji v. Koenig
as 3:2020cv06815
Respondent:
Craig Koenig
Petitioner:
Hydar Al Khafaji
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00969
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Haydar Khafaji v. Patrick Covello, et al
as 20-55449
Defendant / Appellee:
M. VOONG, CHIEF, within the office of appeal, BRIAN ROBERTS, Parole Board Commissioner, PATRICK COVELLO, Warden of R.J.D. State Prison and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HAYDAR AL KHAFAJI, AKA Hydar Al Khafati
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
