Cases 21 - 30 of 65
Mann v. Crabtree et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2018cv00040
Plaintiff:
Mashell R. Mann
Defendant:
Chadwick Crabtree, Steven T. Marshall and Alabama Board of Pardons & Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilbur Ellison v. Alabama Board of Pardons & Par, et al
as 17-13235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILBUR LEE ELLISON
Defendant - Appellee:
ALABAMA BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES, in their individual and official capacities, CYNTHIA DILLARD, Executive Director, BILL WYNNE and others
Marcus Tate v. Alabama Board of Pardons
as 17-12173
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS ORLANDO TATE
Defendant - Appellee:
ALABAMA BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES
McAdams v. King et al
as 1:2017cv00021
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bernard McAdams
Defendant:
Julian M King, Alabama, State of, Steven D Giddens and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodburck Noe v. Warden, et al
as 16-10663
Petitioner - Appellant:
WOODBURCK NOE
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA and ALABAMA BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES
Neil Walker v. Warden, et al
as 15-14597
Petitioner - Appellant:
NEIL WALKER
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN, STATE OF ALABAMA, ALABAMA BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES and others
Mitchell v. Forniss et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2015cv00691
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lee Mitchell
Defendant:
Leon Forniss, Luther Strange and Alabama Board of Pardons & Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Charles Conners v. Alabama Board of Pardons & Par, et al
as 15-13232
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES EDWARD CONNERS
Respondent - Appellee:
ALABAMA BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLES, ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF ALABAMA and LEON FORNISS
Guthrie v. Alabama Board of Pardon & Paroles et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00716
Plaintiff:
Christopher W. Guthrie
Defendant:
Alabama Board of Pardon & Paroles, Cynthia Dillard, Eddie Cook, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-11330
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
