Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Alexander et al v. CRST The Transportation Solution, INC et al
as 4:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
Alan Alexander and Becky Carollo
Defendant:
CRST The Transportation Solution, INC, CRST The Transportation Solution d/b/a/ CRST, CRST International, INC d/b/a/ CRST and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ALEXANDER v. LIFECELL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2023cv01502
Plaintiff:
ALAN ALEXANDER
Defendant:
LIFECELL CORPORATION, ALLERGAN, INC., ALLERGAN USA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Alexander v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03284
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Alan Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hunt v. Alexander et al
as 1:2021cv00837
Defendant:
SCHNEIDER NATIONAL CARRIERS, INC. and TRAVIS ALAN ALEXANDER
Plaintiff:
WILLARD HUNT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Alexander v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2016cv00207
Plaintiff:
Alan Alexander
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Alexander v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2014cv00039
Plaintiff:
Alan Alexander
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Alexander v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2014cv00039
Plaintiff:
Alan Alexander
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Alan Alexander Galvez-Palma
as 2:2010mj00408
Defendant:
Alan Alexander Galvez-Palma (1)
Plaintiff:
USA
Alexander v. BB&T Corporation
as 3:2007cv00010
Plaintiff:
Diane G. Alexander
Defendant:
Branch Banking and Trust Company, Branch Banking and Trust Company and Branch Banking and Trust Company
Counter Claimant:
Branch Banking and Trust Company
ThirdParty Defendant:
Alan Alexander
Counter Defendant:
Diane G. Alexander
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
