Cases 21 - 30 of 91
Scott v. Hall
as 1:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Clayton Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Embry et al
as 1:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Randi Thomas Embry and Logan County Sherrif Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Embry et al
as 1:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Shawn Embry and Logan County Sherrif Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Whittaker et al
as 1:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Kelly Whittaker, Seth Whittaker and Logan County Sherrif's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. FBI Louisville KY headquarters
as 3:2023cv00651
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
FBI Louisville KY headquarters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Wright et al
as 1:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Quinton Wright and Logan County Sherrif's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Logan County Jail
as 1:2023cv00130
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Logan County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Browder et al
as 1:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Antonio Browder, Cody Fox, Drug Task Force and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. DOC SORP Administration et al
as 2:2023cv00777
Plaintiff:
Cortney Alan Scott and Cortney Allen
Defendant:
DOC SORP Administration, Alica Kort, Oak Creek Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BALLARD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04691
Plaintiff:
Aaron Scott Ballard and AARON ALAN SCOTT BALLARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
