Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Darrell Goss v. Julie Armstrong
as 22-7387
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRELL L. GOSS
Defendant / Appellee:
JULIE J. ARMSTRONG, Charleston County Clerk of Court and ALAN WILSON, South Carolina Attorney General
John Hawkins v. South Carolina Commission on Lawyer Conduct
as 22-1632
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN HAWKINS and HAWKLAW PA
Defendant / Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA COMMISSION ON LAWYER CONDUCT and SOUTH CAROLINA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER G. ISGETT, JOHN S NICHOLS and ALAN WILSON, South Carolina Attorney General
Robert Graham, Jr. v. State of South Carolina
as 21-7562
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT GRAHAM, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, FLORENCE COUNTY COURT SYSTEMS and ALAN WILSON, South Carolina Attorney General
Justice 360 v. Bryan Stirling
as 21-2205
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUSTICE 360
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN P. STIRLING, Director of the South Carolina Department of Corrections, ALAN WILSON, South Carolina Attorney General and BRYAN P. STIRLING, Director of the South Carolina Department of Corrections
King Grant-Davis v. Alan Wilson
as 21-2157
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KING GRANT-DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
ALAN WILSON, South Carolina Attorney General, MARK KEEL, Chief of the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, WILLIAM P. BARR, United States Attorney General and others
Eugene Lavergne, et al v. United States House of Rep, et al
as 19-5028
Defendant / Appellee:
Kim Guadagno, Honorable Lt. Governor/Secretary of State, Christopher Porrino, Honorable Acting New Jersey State Attorney General, Karen L. Haas and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eugene Martin Lavergne
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Allen J. Cannon, Frederick John Lavergne, Scott Neuman and others
Bynum Rayfield v. Willie Eagleton
as 15-6393
Petitioner - Appellant:
BYNUM RAYFIELD
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIE L. EAGLETON, Warden
Respondent:
ALAN WILSON, South Carolina Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
