Cases 11 - 20 of 104
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. State of South Carolina
as 22-1921
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, The, ALAN WILSON, Attorney General, WARDEN, Alvin S. Glenn Detention Center and others
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas v. Sarah Weiss
as 22-1917
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIE THERESE ASSA'AD-FALTAS
Defendant / Appellee:
SARA HEATHER SAVITZ WEISS, JOHN MEADORS, BARNEY GIESE, all three individually for damages arising from malicious prosecution and for qui tam recovery and others
John Hawkins v. South Carolina Commission on Lawyer Conduct
as 22-1632
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN HAWKINS and HAWKLAW PA
Defendant / Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA COMMISSION ON LAWYER CONDUCT and SOUTH CAROLINA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER G. ISGETT, JOHN S NICHOLS and ALAN WILSON, South Carolina Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1479
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Robert Graham, Jr. v. State of South Carolina
as 21-7562
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT GRAHAM, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, FLORENCE COUNTY COURT SYSTEMS and ALAN WILSON, South Carolina Attorney General
Justice 360 v. Bryan Stirling
as 21-2205
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUSTICE 360
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN P. STIRLING, Director of the South Carolina Department of Corrections, ALAN WILSON, South Carolina Attorney General and BRYAN P. STIRLING, Director of the South Carolina Department of Corrections
Carolina Youth Action Project v. Alan Wilson
as 21-2166
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CAROLINA YOUTH ACTION PROJECT, D.S., by and through her next of kin Juanita Ford, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and S.P., by and through her next of kin Melissa Downs, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
NIYA KENNY, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and TAUREAN NESMITH, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
ALAN WILSON, in his official capacity as Attorney General of South Carolina
Defendant:
J. ALTON CANNON, JR., in his official capacity as the Sheriff of Charleston County, SC; on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, LUTHER T. REYNOLDS, in his official capacity as the Chief of the Police Department of the City of Charleston, SC, REGINALD L. BURGESS, in his official capacity as the Chief of the Police Department of the City of North Charleston, SC and others
King Grant-Davis v. Alan Wilson
as 21-2157
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KING GRANT-DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
ALAN WILSON, South Carolina Attorney General, MARK KEEL, Chief of the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, WILLIAM P. BARR, United States Attorney General and others
Disability Rights South Carolina v. Henry McMaster
as 21-2070
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DISABILITY RIGHTS SOUTH CAROLINA, ABLE SOUTH CAROLINA, AMANDA MCDOUGALD SCOTT, individually and on behalf of P.S., a minor and others
Defendant / Appellant:
HENRY MCMASTER, in his official capacity as Governor of South Carolina, ALAN WILSON, in his official capacity as Attorney General of South Carolina and HENRY DARGAN MCMASTER, in his official capacity as Governor of South Carolina
Defendant:
MOLLY SPEARMAN, in her official capacity as State Superintendent of Education, GREENVILLE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, HORRY COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS, SOUTH CAROLINA CHAPTER OF AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defenders of Wildlife v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service
as 21-1759
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Intervenor Defendant:
CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Intervenor:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA EX REL ALAN WILSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL and SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
