Cases 21 - 30 of 131
Moore v. Stirling et al
as 3:2020cv04084
Defendant:
Bryan P Stirling, Alan Wilson and South Carolina Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Richard Bernard Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Norris v. McMaster et al
as 8:2020cv03717
Plaintiff:
Carnie Norris, III
Defendant:
Alan Wilson, Bryan Stirling and Henery McMaster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster v. Powell et al
as 7:2020cv03252
Defendant:
Ashley C Harris, Tony Fisher, Larry W Powell and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Foster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Tulsa Police Department et al
as 4:2020cv00184
Defendant:
Tulsa Police Department and Officer McKinney
Plaintiff:
Timothy Alan Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gay v. State of South Carolina et al
as 3:2019cv03474
Defendant:
Attorney General Alan Wilson, State of South Carolina, Lindsey A. McCallister and others
Plaintiff:
Donald W. Gay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders v. Coleman et al
as 1:2019cv03138
Plaintiff:
Tunzy Antwain Sanders
Defendant:
Doyet A. Early, III, Alan Wilson, Chandra E. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROCHESTER v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv00792
Plaintiff:
JULIAN E. ROCHESTER
Defendant:
BETH DRAKE, BRYAN STIRLING, U.S.D. CT. SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Hood et al
as 6:2019cv01702
Defendant:
Judge Harwell, B Stirling, J W McBride and others
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniels v. Lott et al
as 7:2019cv00507
Plaintiff:
Kevin Wayne McDaniels and Shawn C. Hall
Defendant:
Robert Hall, Leon Lott, Barry Barnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. South Carolina, State of et al
as 5:2019cv00010
Defendant:
Solicitor David Pascoe, Judge James Williams, South Carolina, State of and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
