Cases 1 - 10 of 126
Hester v. Albany County District Attorney
as 24-570
Plaintiff:
RONALD L. HESTER
Defendant:
Det. JASON KELLY, Det. JOHN REGAN, Sgt. BRIAN PLANTE and others
Rowlands et al v. US Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 1:2023cv01567
Petitioner:
Sylvia Rowlands, Phillip Rowlands, Daniel Maier and others
Respondent:
US Army Corps of Engineers, US Maritime Administration Department, NYS Department of Environmental Conservation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Murphy v. New York State Department of Children and Family Services, et al
as 1:2023cv01533
Plaintiff:
Malik Murphy
Defendant:
New York State Department of Children and Family Services, Albany County Department for Children Youth and Families, Jennifer Trager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hayes v. Albany County Jail
as 9:2023cv00842
Plaintiff:
Leryco Hayes
Defendant:
Albany County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. The City of Albany et al
as 1:2023cv00686
Plaintiff:
Olaijaide Chapman
Defendant:
The City of Albany, The County of Albany, The County of Albany Police Department and others
Cross Defendant:
Detective Lawrence Heid
Cross Claimant:
Assistant District Attorney Shannon Corbitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Vance v. The State of New York Department of Corrections
as 22-3206
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Wayne Phillip Vance
Defendant / Appellee:
Glen Engstrom, Officer, Clinton Correctional Facility, Ambrose Waldron, Officer, Clinton Correctional Facility, Chad Rowe, Officer, Clinton Correctional Facility and others
Defendant:
The State of New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Anthony J. Annucci, Commissioner of the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Karen Bellamy, Director, Inmate Grievance Program for DOCCS and others
Vance v. The State of New York Department of Corrections
as 22-3095
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Wayne Phillip Vance
Defendant:
The State of New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Anthony J. Annucci, Commissioner of the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Karen Bellamy, Director, Inmate Grievance Program for DOCCS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
A. Rodriguez, Director, Special Housing and Disciplinary Program, DOCCS, Mr. Weishaupt, Special Investigator, DOCCS, Glen Engstrom, Officer, Clinton Correctional Facility and others
The Phoenix of Albany, LLC v. County of Albany
as 22-3011
Plaintiff / Appellant:
The Phoenix of Albany, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
County of Albany and Jeffrey Neal, as Director of Albany County Division of Finance
Antonyuk v. Hochul
as 22-2972
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant:
William Fitzpatrick, in his Official Capacity as the Onondaga County District Attorney, Eugene Conway, in his Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Onondaga County, P. David Soares, in his Official Capacity as the District Attorney of Albany County and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph Cecile
Amicus Curiae:
The City of New York, New York County District Attorney, Greater New York Hospital Association and others
Petitioner:
Bishops of the Episcopal Church in New York and New England et al, Jaclyn Schildkraut and 30 Members of New York State Legislature
Antonyuk v. Hochul
as 22-2908
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant:
William Fitzpatrick, in his Official Capacity as the Onondaga County District Attorney, Eugene Conway, in his Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Onondaga County, P. David Soares, in his Official Capacity as the District Attorney of Albany County and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph Cecile, Steven A. Nigrelli, in his Official Capacity as Acting Superintendent of the New York State Police and Matthew J. Doran, in his Official Capacity as the Licensing official of Onondaga County
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
