Cases 1 - 10 of 35
ARDEX LABORATORIES, INC. et al v. Hernandez
as 9:2023cv81557
Plaintiff:
ARDEX LABORATORIES, INC. and ARDEX OF SOUTH FLORIDA, LLC
Defendant:
Albert Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Ardex Laboratories, Inc. et al v. Hernandez
as 9:2023cv81559
Plaintiff:
ARDEX LABORATORIES, INC. and ARDEX OF SOUTH FLORIDA, LLC
Counter Claimant:
Albert Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hernandez v. Carco Group, Inc.
as 2:2023cv06293
Plaintiff:
Albert Hernandez
Defendant:
Carco Group, Inc. doing business as Driver IQ
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
HERNANDEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10650
Plaintiff:
ALBERT HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hernandez v. Curry County Detention Center
as 2:2022cv00792
Plaintiff:
Albert Hernandez
Defendant:
Curry County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Davis
as 7:2022cv00539
Petitioner:
Enrique Albert Hernandez
Respondent:
Melvin Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HERNANDEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv09829
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALBERT HERNANDEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00261
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HERNANDEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv14314
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALBERT HERNANDEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HERNANDEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv03645
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN ALBERT HERNANDEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
