Cases 1 - 10 of 16
UPSHUR v. MCGINLEY
as 2:2017cv04667
Plaintiff:
ALBERT WILLIAM UPSHUR
Defendant:
THOMAS MCGINLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UPSHUR v. ANZIDEO et al
as 2:2017cv04663
Plaintiff:
ALBERT WILLIAM UPSHUR
Defendant:
DAVID ANZIDEO and ANTHONY ANZIDEO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALBERT WILLIAM UPSHUR TRUST v. CHAMP et al
as 2:2017cv04092
Plaintiff:
ALBERT WILLIAM UPSHUR TRUST
Defendant:
GARY CHAMP, CHARLES J. CUNNINGHAM, III, RAYFORD A. MEANS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Ebbert
as 3:2015cv01609
Petitioner:
Albert Williams
Respondent:
David J. Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
UPSHUR et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PA et al
as 2:2015cv02886
Plaintiff:
ALBERT UPSHUR, ALBERT WILLIAM UPSHUR, EVON JEFFERS and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PA, GARY CHAMP, KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00582
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
UPSHUR v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv02914
Plaintiff:
ALBERT WILLIAM UPSHUR
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, GARY CHAMP, WILLIAM CHRISTOPHER MONTOYA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UPSHUR v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2013cv01917
Plaintiff:
ALBERT WILLIAM UPSHUR
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, CHARLES J. CUNNINGHAM, A. MEANS RAYFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv40972
Plaintiff:
ALBERT WILLIAMS, SR and CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
WILLIAMS et al v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv63702
Plaintiff:
ALBERT WILLIAMS
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , GAF CORPORATION, OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
