Cases 111 - 120 of 223
Boggon et al v. Chertoff et al
as 3:2007cv00952
Plaintiff:
Titus Boggon and Jennifer Lee
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Alberto Gonzales, Emilio Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ayub v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv05725
Petitioner:
Mohammed Ayub
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Robert Divine and others
Defendant:
Robert Mueller
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Maung v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv00373
Petitioner:
Han Thein Maung
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, William Cleary and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Park v. Gonzales
as 1:2007cv02356
Plaintiff:
Dae Il Park
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Chen v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv02312
Plaintiff:
Yi-Ching Chen
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Han v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv02313
Plaintiff:
Hiu Yuk Sakura Han
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Alexis v. Gonzales et al
as 9:2007cv00620
Petitioner:
Bayne Alexis
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales and James L. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
