Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Wang et al v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv00948
Plaintiff:
Chengbin Wang and Helen Ding
Defendant:
Alberto R. Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Natalucci v. Gonzales et al
as 6:2007cv00708
Plaintiff:
Anna Natalucci
Defendant:
Alberto R. Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Awala v. Zloch et al
as 1:2007cv20863
Plaintiff:
Gbeke Michael Awala
Defendant:
William J. Zloch, James Lawrence King, Frederico A. Moreno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole et al v. Bush et al
as 1:2007cv00624
Plaintiff:
Carol Cole and The Department of Justice
Defendant:
George W. Bush, Alberto R. Gonzales, Robert S. Mueller, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sahib et al v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2007cv00348
Plaintiff:
Mudir Nizar Sahib, Nazar Sahib Kadhim, Karim Merzah and others
Defendant:
Alberto R. Gonzales, Robert S. Mueller, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Mulumba v. Chertoff et al
as 4:2007cv00212
Petitioner:
Malaba G Mulumba
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff, Michael Chertoff, Alberto R Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dagar et al v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv00179
Plaintiff:
Paramjeet Dagar and Shruti Lamba
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Alberto R. Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Serralta v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv00153
Plaintiff:
Matthieu Serralta
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzales, Alberto R. Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
