Cases 1 - 10 of 24
GAR Contractors, Inc. v. Romero
as 1:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
GAR Contractors, Inc.
Defendant:
Alberto Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
ROMERO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv20408
Plaintiff:
ALBERTO ROMERO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Romero Cuza v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2022cv00598
Petitioner:
Cesar Alberto Romero Cuza
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Towner et al v. Aguirre et al
as 2:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Wendy Towner, Francisco Aguilera, Nick MacFarland and others
Defendant:
Century Arms, Inc. and Romarm, S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Villalta-Cisneros v. Garland
as 21-894
Petitioner:
JORGE EDUARDO RIVERA-VILLALTA, WENDY CECILIA VILLALTA-CISNEROS, CARLOS ALBERTO ROMERO-RAMIREZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
ROMERO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv45948
Plaintiff:
BENITO ALBERTO ROMERO
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jorge Romero Castillo v. Attorney General United States
as 21-2220
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
JORGE ALBERTO ROMERO CASTILLO
USA v. Cesar Cuza
as 21-10054
Defendant / Appellant:
CESAR ALBERTO ROMERO CUZA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ROMERO-CERVANTES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv13718
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALBERTO ROMERO-CERVANTES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Romero Cuza v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv20465
Plaintiff:
Cesar Alberto Romero Cuza
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
