Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Adams v. Alberto-Culver USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08405
Plaintiff:
Sheri Adams
Defendant:
Alberto-Culver USA, Inc., Barretts Minerals Inc., BRENNTAG NORTH AMERICA, INC., sued individually and as successor-in-interest to MINERAL PIGMENT SOLUTIONS, INC. and as successor-in-interest to WHITTAKER CLARK & DANIELS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Katty Zelaya v. Alberto-Culver USA Inc et al
as 5:2011cv01734
Defendant:
Alberto-Culver USA Inc and Does
Plaintiff:
Katty Zelaya
Alberto-Culver International, Inc. et al v. Apollo Health and Beauty Care Corporation
as 1:2011cv02466
Plaintiff:
Alberto-Culver International, Inc. and Alberto-Culver USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Apollo Health and Beauty Care Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Alberto-Culver International, Inc. et al v. Garcoa, Inc.
as 1:2011cv00481
Plaintiff:
Alberto-Culver International, Inc. and Alberto-Culver USA, INC.
Defendant:
Garcoa, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
v. Procter & Gamble Company, The et al
as 1:2009cv05899
Defendant:
Procter & Gamble Company, The and Noxell Corporation
Plaintiff:
Alberto Culver USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Dimmock et al v. Alberto-Culver USA Inc et al
as 4:2008cv00010
Plaintiff:
Duron Dimmock and Michele Dimmock
Defendant:
WALMART STORES EAST LP, CORPORATE DOE and Alberto Culver USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Odiorne v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc et al
as 2:2005cv00079
Not Classified By Court:
Ronald P Kuker
Plaintiff:
Lauren Odiorne
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East LP, McLane Company Inc, Pro-Line International Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
