Cases 1 - 6 of 6
City of Providence, et al v. Warner Chilcott (US), LLC, et al
as 19-8026
Petitioner:
WARNER CHILCOTT SALES (US), LLC, WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., WARNER CHILCOTT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
KROGER COMPANY, MARY ALEXANDER, a resident citizen of the State of North Carolina, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, WALGREEN CO. and others
Respondent:
ELECTRICAL WORKERS 242 & 294 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL 35 HEALTH CARE FUND, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Interested Party:
BAYER HEALTHCARE, LLC,, CAREMARK, LLC and CVS HEALTH CORPORATION
Defendant:
ALLERGAN, PLC, WARNER CHILCOTT HOLDINGS COMPANY III, LTD., LUPIN LTD. and others
Ahold U.S.A., Inc. v. Warner Chilcott Public Limited, et al
as 19-8014
Petitioner:
WARNER CHILCOTT SALES (US), LLC, WARNER CHILCOTT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
KROGER COMPANY, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE BENEFITS FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, MARY ALEXANDER, a resident citizen of the State of North Carolina, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Interested Party:
BAYER HEALTHCARE, LLC,, CAREMARK, LLC and CVS HEALTH CORPORATION
Defendant:
ALLERGAN, PLC, LUPIN LTD., WARNER CHILCOTT CORPORATION and others
Respondent:
AHOLD U.S.A., INC.
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, ASSOCIATION FOR ACCESSIBLE MEDICINES, PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA and others
SIMS v. ALBERTSONS, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv10553
Plaintiff:
Derrick Sims
Defendant:
ALBERTSONS, LLC and SUPERVALU, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
City of Providence, RI, et al v. Warner Chilcott Company, LLC, et al
as 15-1250
Plaintiff:
PROVIDENCE, RI, individually and on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, NEW YORK HOTEL TRADES COUNCIL AND HOTEL ASSOC. OF NEW YORK CITY, INC. HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMERICAN SALES COMPANY, LLC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and ROCHESTER DRUG CO-OPERATIVE, INC., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
WARNER CHILCOTT COMPANY, LLC, WARNER CHILCOTT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, WARNER CHILCOTT HOLDINGS COMPANY, III, LTD. and others
In re Solodyn (Minocycline Hydrochloride) Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2014md02503
Plaintiff:
Sheet Metal Workers Local No. 25 Health & Welfare Fund, United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Employers Health and Welfare Fund, Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31 and others
Not Classified By Court:
National Medical Health Card Systems, Inc., California Physicians' Service d/b/a Blue Shield of California, United HealthCare Services, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Barr Laboratories, Inc., Matrix Laboratories Ltd., Ranbaxy Laboratories, LTD and others
In Re:
Solodyn (Minocycline Hydrochloride) Antitrust Litigation
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Consolidated Plaintiffs
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Loestrin 24 FE Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2013md02472
Plaintiff:
Fraternal Order of Police Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31, HEB Grocery Company L.P., Rite-Aid Corporation and others
Defendant:
Warner Chilcott Holdings Company III, Ltd., Warner Chilcott Sales (US), LLC, Warner Chilcott Company, LLC and others
Interested Party:
Health Care Service Corporation, Caremark, LLC, CVS Health Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
