Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Anemana v. Mayorkas
as 3:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Alexis Anemana
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1529
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Bosch v. Biden, et al
as 1:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
Gerard van den Bosch
Defendant:
Joseph Biden, Jr, Rochelle Walensky, The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Taleb v. MAYORKAS et al
as 2:2022cv10409
Plaintiff:
Ali Taleb
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Zou v. Mayorkas et al
as 2:2022cv02066
Plaintiff:
Xu Zou
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Attorney General Merrick Garland and Lynuel Dennis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Oliver v. Mayorkas et al
as 3:2021cv12052
Plaintiff:
Weyshira Oliver
Defendant:
Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, United States Department of Homeland Security, Secretary of and Alejandro Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
