Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
USA v. Munoz
as 22-30805
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Alejandro Munoz, also known as Alex Munoz
USA v. Munoz-Guerrero
as 22-50572
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Gabriel Munoz-Guerrero, true name Gabriel Alejandro Munoz-Guerrero
Munoz-Gonzalez v. D.L.C. Limousine Service, Inc.
as 17-2438
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Alejandro Munoz-Gonzalez, on behalf of himself, individually, on behalf of all others similarly situated, Danual Martin, Thomas Acheampong and others
Defendant - Appellee:
D.L.C. Limousine Service, Inc., Chris Thornton, individually, John D'Agostino, D'Agostino and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Alejandro Munoz v. Pacific Racing Association
as 3:2017cv02611
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Munoz
Defendant:
Pacific Racing Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Alejandro Galvan
as 16-10513
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ALEJANDRO MUNOZ GALVAN, AKA Abel Lemus
Munoz-Gonzalez v. D.L.C. Limousine Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv09368
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Munoz-Gonzalez , Danual Martin and Thomas Acheampong
Defendant:
D.L.C. Limousine Service, Inc., Chris Thornton, Melissa Thornton and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Losey v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2015cv07416
Plaintiff:
Ashley Losey , Cayden Losey , Destiney Losey and others
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015mi00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
