Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Harris v. State of Florida et al
as 5:2021cv00030
Defendant:
Alex Azar, Health and Human Services, W. Stephen Muldrow and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony James Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Azar
as 1:2020cv23546
Defendant:
Alex Azar
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Martinez
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551
RAWLS v AZAR
as 5:2020cv00055
Defendant:
Alex Azar
Plaintiff:
Lavonda Rawls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Cubillas v. Azar
as 1:2020cv20637
Defendant:
Alex Azar
Plaintiff:
Carlos Cubillas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Gordon v. Azar et al
as 0:2019cv63041
Defendant:
Alex Azar, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Plaintiff:
Howard Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2005
Leach v. Azar
as 9:2019cv81264
Plaintiff:
John P. Leach
Defendant:
Secretary of Department of Health and Human Services and Alex Azar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Azarko v. Azar
as 2:2019cv00650
Defendant:
Alex Azar
Interested Party:
United States Attorney Office for the Middle District of Florida
Plaintiff:
Nonna Azarko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2005
Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Azar et al
as 1:2019cv22425
Plaintiff:
Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant:
Alex Azar, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Norman Sharpless and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Shands Jacksonville Medical Center, Inc. v. Azar
as 3:2019cv00579
Defendant:
Alex Azar, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Health & Human Services and Alex Azar
Plaintiff:
Shands Jacksonville Medical Center, Inc. d/b/a UF Health Jacksonville, Shands Jacksonville Medical Center, Inc. and Shands Jacksonville Medical Center, Inc. a Florida non-profit corporation doing business as UF Health Jacksonville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
