Cases 1 - 10 of 11
NATIONAL CONSUMER VOICE FOR QUALITY LONG-TERM CARE et al v. AZAR et al
as 1:2021cv00162
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ALEX M. AZAR, II, SECRETARY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
CALIFORNIA ADVOCATES FOR NURSING HOME REFORM and NATIONAL CONSUMER VOICE FOR QUALITY LONG-TERM CARE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
AFFINIS HOSPICE, LLC v. AZAR, II, SECRETARY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2020cv03700
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II, SECRETARY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and ALEX M. AZAR, II
Plaintiff:
AFFINIS HOSPICE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Enloe Medical Center et al v. Alex M. Azar II
as 2:2020cv09278
Plaintiff:
County of Riverside doing business as Riverside University Health Systems-Medical Center also known as Riverside County Regional Medical Center, County of San Bernardino doing business as Arrowhead Regional Medical Center, Good Samaritan Hospital, a California Limited Partnership doing business as Good Samaritan Hospital and others
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar II, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity and Alex M. Azar, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Acute Care Ambulance Service, LLC v. Alex M. Azar II
as 7:2020cv00217
Plaintiff:
Acute Care Ambulance Service, LLC
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar II, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services and Alex M. Azar, ll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
District Hospital Partners, et al v. Alex Azar, II
as 20-5222
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UHS-Corona, Inc., doing business as Corona Regional Medical Center, Lancaster Hospital Corporation, doing business as Lancaster Community Hospital, UHS of Oklahoma, Inc., doing business as St. Mary's Regional Medical Center and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex M. Azar, II, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services
Yale New Haven Hospital v. Azar
as 20-2151
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Yale New Haven Hospital
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex M. Azar, II, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services
Yale New Haven Hospital v. Azar
as 20-2115
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Yale New Haven Hospital
Defendant / Appellant:
Alex M. Azar, II, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services
Cassandra Menoken v. Dale Cabaniss, et al
as 19-5319
Defendant / Appellee:
Dale Cabaniss, Director, Office of Personnel Management, Margaret Weichert, Acting Director, Office of Personnel Management and Alex M. Azar, II, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cassandra M. Menoken, Esquire
Samuel Philbrick, et al v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 19-5293
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Alex M. Azar, II, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ian Ludders, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Karin Vlk, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Samuel Philbrick, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services
Samuel Philbrick, et al v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 19-5295
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ian Ludders, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Karin Vlk, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Samuel Philbrick, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Alex M. Azar, II, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
