Cases 1 - 10 of 440
PERDUE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY K. PERDUE
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DENNIS REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laboy v. Adams et al
as 4:2024cv04069
Plaintiff:
Hector Laboy
Defendant:
Austin Adams, Alexander Stuart, Jamar Range and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Menes Weightman v. Ellen O'Brien, et al
as 24-1543
Plaintiff:
MENES ALEXANDER WEIGHTMAN
Defendant:
ELLEN O'BRIEN, Doctor, DIANA L. SIMMONS and CHERYL JEANPIERRE
Hampton v. Western Illinois Correctional Center
as 3:2024cv03080
Plaintiff:
Alexander Hampton
Defendant:
Western Illinois Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Western Illinois CC
as 3:2024cv03076
Plaintiff:
Alexander Hampton
Defendant:
Western Illinois CC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00235
Petitioner:
Justin Alexander and Justin Martin Alexander
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00236
Petitioner:
Justin Alexander and Justin Martin Alexander
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00237
Petitioner:
Justin Alexander
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hampton v. Western Illinois Correctional Center
as 3:2024cv03047
Plaintiff:
Alexander Hampton
Defendant:
Western Illinois Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Molinaro
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Ricky N Alexander
Defendant:
Officer M Molinaro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
