Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Alexander v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00235
Petitioner:
Justin Alexander and Justin Martin Alexander
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00236
Petitioner:
Justin Alexander and Justin Martin Alexander
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00237
Petitioner:
Justin Alexander
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRUMMET v. WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; MEDICAL/DENTIST EMPLOYEES
as 2:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER LEE BRUMMET
Defendant:
WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; MEDICAL/DENTIST EMPLOYEES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Warden
as 3:2023cv01060
Petitioner:
Michael Derrick Alexander and Michael D Alexander
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00947
Petitioner:
Michael Derrick Alexander and Michael D Alexander
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Atkins v. Marks et al
as 1:2023cv00428
Plaintiff:
Steven Atkins
Defendant:
Jerad Marks, David Felts, Tom Chaille and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RONDEAU et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01749
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RONDEAU, BRADY TURNER, CORY GRAY and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BLAINE v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2023cv00456
Plaintiff:
DILON BLAINE
Defendant:
DAVIS, RUSH and ALEXANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALEXANDER v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2023cv01602
Plaintiff:
RYAN ALEXANDER
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, ADONIA MYKONA, ANDREA FULTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
