Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Palomarez v. Young et al
as 5:2015cv05007
Petitioner:
Alexander Schroder Palomarez
Respondent:
Darin Young and Marty J. Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Salway v. Dooley et al
as 5:2013cv05068
Petitioner:
Alexander J. Salway
Respondent:
Warden Dooley and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hunt v. Yantis et al
as 5:2013cv05041
Plaintiff:
Harold Hunt
Defendant:
Yantis, Laurie Good, Tiffany Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv04093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gigov v. Coyle
as 4:2012cv04027
Plaintiff:
Alexander Gigov
Defendant:
Sarah Coyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young v. Klusken et al
as 4:2011cv04056
Plaintiff:
Alexander C. Young
Defendant:
Ronald Klusken, National Outdoors Leadership School and Does 1 to 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker et al v. Masco Builder Cabinet Group, Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv05085
Plaintiff:
Cody Baker, Cody Baker, James V. McCoy and others
Defendant:
Masco Builder Cabinet Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Kasack v. Griswold et al
as 5:2008cv05079
Plaintiff:
Alexander Kasack, Jr.
Defendant:
Pam Griswold and John Doe
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
USA v. White Plume, et al
as 5:2002cv05071
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Alexander White Plume and Percy White Plume
Counter_claimant:
Alexander White Plume and Percy White Plume
Counter_defendant:
United States of America
Intervenor_defendant:
Tierra Madre, LLC and Madison Hemp & Flax Company 1806, Inc.
Amicu:
Oglala Sioux Tribe
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
