Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Roberson v. Hughes et al
as 1:2026cv01015
Plaintiff:
Edward Roberson
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Mindi Nurse, Tyrone Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Baker et al
as 4:2025cv04173
Plaintiff:
Edgar M Diaz
Defendant:
Tyrone Baker, Roy Little, Alexander Stuart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stuart v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2025cv00901
Petitioner:
James Alexander Stuart
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nicholson v. Fryrear et al
as 4:2025cv04048
Plaintiff:
Jemetric Nicholson
Defendant:
D. Fryrear, Alexander Stuart, Jamar Range and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jasso v. Hughes et al
as 4:2025cv04038
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Jasso
Defendant:
LaToya Hughes, Margaret Madole, Tyrone L Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jasso v. Little et al
as 4:2024cv04101
Defendant:
Tim Shotts, John Doe, Alexander Stuart and others
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Jasso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laboy v. Adams et al
as 4:2024cv04069
Plaintiff:
Hector Laboy
Defendant:
Austin Adams, Alexander Stuart, Jamar Range and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Dorethy et al
as 4:2021cv04198
Plaintiff:
Ricky Patterson
Defendant:
Stephanie Dorethy, C J McLaughlin, . Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Dorethy et al
as 3:2021cv01441
Plaintiff:
Ricky Patterson
Defendant:
Warden Stephanie Dorethy, C. J. McLaughlin, Lieutenant Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STUART v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv09342
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER STUART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
