Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Vasquez v. Helmsman Management Services, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00752
Plaintiff:
Alexis Vasquez
Defendant:
Helmsman Management Services, LLC, Uber Insurance Services, LLC and Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Vasquez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2022cv02235
Plaintiff:
Alexis Vasquez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
VASQUEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv73223
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALEXIS VASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vasquez v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2018cv22406
Defendant:
Warden Bryan K. Dobbs, FPC-Miami, FCI - Miami and others
Plaintiff:
Giovanny Alexis Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Osman Vasquez-Mejia v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-60740
Petitioner:
OSMAN RENE VASQUEZ-MEJIA, also known as Paul Alexi Vasquez, also known as Osman Rene Barahona
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Tucker v. East Side DD
as 13-96
Petitioner:
East Side DD 101 LLC, East Side DD 104 LLC, East Side DD 105 LLC and others
Respondent:
Melissa Tucker, Individually and on behalf of all other employees similarly situated, Benisha Huger, Mariana Penafiel, individually and on behalf of all other employees similarly situated and others
Velazquez v. Osceola County Corrections Department
as 6:2011cv01366
Plaintiff:
Daniel Velazquez
Defendant:
Osceola County Corrections Department, Alexis Vasquez, Michael Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vasquez v. Rock
as 10-2564
Petitioner - Appellant:
Alexis Vasquez
Respondent - Appellee:
David Rock, Superintendent
Vasquez v. Rock
as 1:2008cv01623
Petitioner:
Alexis Vasquez
Respondent:
David Rock and David Rock
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
