Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03382
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Sutcliffe v. Duffy et al
as 1:2015cv02310
Plaintiff:
John E. Sutcliffe
Defendant:
William Duffy, The United States, Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. REAL ESTATE et al
as 1:2013cv00015
Defendant:
REAL ESTATE, VEHICLE(S) and All Defendants
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
U. S. Transit, Inc. v. Erwin et al
as 1:2012cv03894
Plaintiff:
U. S. Transit, Inc.
Defendant:
Carl Douglas Erwin, Jr. , Michael Erwin , Rodger Dickey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2679
In RE: Mentor Corp. Obtape Transobturator Sling Products Liability Litigation
as 3:2008md02004
Plaintiff:
All Plaintiffs
Defendant:
All Defendants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
IN RE: Mentor Corp. Obtape Transobturator Sling Products Liability Litigation
as 4:2008md02004
Plaintiff:
All Plaintiffs
Defendant:
All Defendants
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02595
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Hammock v. Walker, et al
as 5:2001cv00389
Plaintiff:
Billy N Hammock
Defendant:
Victor Walker , Mr. Frazier , Mr. Furlow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cason, et al v. Seckinger, et al
as 5:1984cv00313
Plaintiff:
Buddy Cason , Vikki Contreras , Patricia Lequeux and others
Defendant:
Jim Seckinger , Thomas C. Jones, Jr. , Elie Jones and others
Consol_defendant:
Bobby K. Whitworth , Calvin Green , Thomas C. Jones, Jr. and others
Consol_plaintiff:
Deown P. Washington and Gerald Wendell Spivey
Movant:
Donald Dempsey, Albert Thomas and Sharon Bush Ellison
Amicu:
Donald Dempsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
