Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 1,186
ESTATE OF CARMEN E. CRESPO et al v. DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF KOREA
as 1:2022cv01514
Plaintiff: CARMEN E. CRESPO, MARCIANO CRESPO-GONZALEZ, CARMEN M. MARTINEZ-CAMACHO and others
Defendant: DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF KOREA and NORTH KOREA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
FLORES et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2022cv01512
Plaintiff: RUBEN V. FLORES, DELIA D. FLORES, JOSHUA D. FLORES and others
Defendant: ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and SYRIAN ARAB REPUBLIC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Kaplan v. Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran
as 22-1122
Plaintiff / Appellant: Chaim Kaplan, individually and as natural guardian of plaintiffs M.K.(1), A.L.K., M.K.(2), C.K. and E.K, Rivka Kaplan, individually and as natural guardian of plaintiffs M.K.(1), A.L.K., M.K.(2), C.K. and E.K, M.K.(1), a minor, by her father and natural guardian, Chaim Kaplan, and by her mother and natural guardian, Rivka Kaplan and others
Defendant: Bank Saderat Iran, Central Bank Of The Islamic Republic Of Iran, AKA Bank Markazi Jomhouri Islami Iran, Islamic Republic of Iran and others
Defendant / Appellee: Bank Saderat PLC, Attn: Dr. Hamid Borhani, Managing Director, Bank Saderat 6 Lothbury London EC2R 7HD UK
ADVOCATE CHRIST MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2022cv01328
Plaintiff: ADVOCATE CHRIST MEDICAL CENTER, ADVOCATE ILLINOIS MASONIC MEDICAL CENTER, ADVOCATE LUTHERAN GENERAL HOSPITAL and others
Defendant: XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Addison v. Transamerica Retirement
as 22-90016
Respondent: Gloria A. Addison, Gary P. Allen, All Plaintiffs and others
Petitioner: Transamerica Retirement Solutions, L.L.C., formerly known as Diversified Retirement Corporation
Julia Cavazos, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-5084
Plaintiff / Appellant: Julia Cavazos, Nancy Cisneros, Debra Cicalo and others
Defendant / Appellee: Debra A. Haaland, in her Official Capacity as Secretary of the Interior, Bryan Newland, in his Official Capacity as Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs of the Department of the Interior and Darryl LaCounte, in his Official Capacity as Director of the Bureau of Indian Affairs
Intervenor / Appellee: Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan
Bennie G. Thompson, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 22-7031
Plaintiff / Appellee: Bennie G. Thompson, Hon., in his personal capacity, Bonnie Watson Coleman, Karen Bass and others
Defendant / Appellant: Donald J. Trump, solely in his personal capacity
Defendant / Appellee: Rudolph W. Giuliani, Proud Boys International, L.L.C., Oath Keepers and others
Julia Cavazos, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-5061
Plaintiff / Appellee: Julia Cavazos, Nancy Cisneros, Debra Cicalo and others
Defendant / Appellant: Debra A. Haaland, in her Official Capacity as Secretary of the Interior, Bryan Newland, in his Official Capacity as Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs of the Department of the Interior and Darryl LaCounte, in his Official Capacity as Director of the Bureau of Indian Affairs
Intervenor / Appellee: Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan
GOODINSON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv01320
Plaintiff: CHARLES GOODINSON and ALL PLAINTIFFS
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON SERVICES, INC., MEDICAL DEVICE BUSINESS SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Notice for Removal - Product Liability
BOU JABBOUR et al v. BLINKEN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00451
Plaintiff: PAUL BOU JABBOUR, RAMESH ADHIKARI, SUREN AKHVERDYAN and others
Defendant: ANTHONY BLINKEN, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, AMERICAN INSTITUTE IN TAIWAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?