Cases 21 - 30 of 149
Blackwell v. USA
as 1:2023cv00080
Petitioner:
Christopher Allen Blackwell
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Wren v. Anderson et al
as 2:2022cv00973
Plaintiff:
Allen Mark Wren
Defendant:
FNU Anderson, FNU Rodriguez, FNU Marquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00780
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Daigle v. Mathew et al
as 1:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Claudia Daigle
Defendant:
Francis J. Mathew, Julie J Vargas, John P Hays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sosa v. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
Maryann Sosa
Defendant:
Cody Allen Johnson, Texas Industrial Choice, LLC and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Crowe v. Gee et al
as 1:2021cv00503
Defendant:
Eric Newton, Amy Gee and United States Probation Office District of New Mexico
Plaintiff:
John Allen Crowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barber v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2021cv00283
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Allen Kent Barber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Martinez et al v. Core Civic et al
as 1:2020cv01309
Petitioner:
Howard Roy Allen, Matthew Martinez, Matthew Von Rotz and others
Respondent:
Sonya K Chavez, CoreCivic Inc., Donald W Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeGraff v. Martinez
as 1:2020cv01202
Plaintiff:
Steven Allen DeGraff
Defendant:
Lemuel L. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price v. Whitten et al
as 2:2020cv01099
Defendant:
Francis Whitten, The City of Las Cruces doing business as The Las Cruces Police Department and Thaddeus Allen
Plaintiff:
Mark Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
