Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Adams v. Callo, et al.
as 24-1657
Plaintiff:
BRANDON ADAMS
Defendant:
J. CALLO, YELENA A. WILLIAMS, DELANEY ANDERSEN and others
Eun Lim v. City of Irvine, et al
as 23-55661
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EUN JUNG LIM
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF IRVINE, CITY OF IRVINE POLICE DEPARTMENT, RENE NUTTER, Police Officer, Badge No. 635, individual and official capacity and others
Eun Lim v. City of Irvine, et al
as 23-55221
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EUN JUNG LIM
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF IRVINE, CITY OF IRVINE POLICE DEPARTMENT, RENE NUTTER, Police Officer, Badge No. 635, individual and official capacity and others
Eun Lim v. City of Irvine, et al
as 23-55178
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EUN JUNG LIM
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF IRVINE, CITY OF IRVINE POLICE DEPARTMENT, RENE NUTTER, Police Officer, Badge No. 635, individual and official capacity and others
Adams v. Callo et al
as 2:2023cv00275
Plaintiff:
Brandon Adams
Defendant:
J. Callo, Yelena A. Williams, L. Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Stephon Pemmie et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05001
Plaintiff:
Stephon Pemmie, Byron Pena, Megan Peppers and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Pemmie et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00807
Plaintiff:
Stephon Pemmie, Byron Pena, Megan Peppers and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Pemmie et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00807
Plaintiff:
Pemmie, Stephon Pemmie, Byron Pena and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Eun Jung Lim v. Irvine City et al
as 8:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
Eun Jung Lim
Defendant:
Irvine City, Sergeant-Detective Sean Paul Crawford, Michele Hinig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Enard v. McClane et al
as 4:2021cv00559
Defendant:
Terry Fogle, Allison Taylor, Marsha McClane and others
Plaintiff:
John Michael Enard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
