Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Rebeca Aplonia Gross et al v. Susanne S. Cho et al
as 5:2023cv02637
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Apolonia Gross, Z. T. B. and L. R. R. W.
Defendant:
Susanne S. Cho, Natalie M.P. Lough, Elizabth E. Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Obeidalla Birair, et al v. Jason Flam, et al
as 19-16068
Defendant:
AMANDA TORRES, in her individual capacity, EDMOND KOLYCHECK, in his individual capacity, CANDIDA CARRION, in her individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OBEIDALLA BIRAIR, husband and father of minor children and INTISAR BIRAIR, wife and mother of minor children on behalf of Mo.B.; A.B.; Hy.B.; Mu.B.; Ha.B.
Defendant / Appellee:
JASON FLAM, in his individual capacity
Birair et al v. Kolycheck et al
as 2:2015cv01807
Plaintiff:
Obeidalla Birair and Intisar Birair
Defendant:
Edmond Kolycheck, Sarah Kramer, Candida Carrion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leanna Smith v. Kathryn Coffman, et al
as 14-15473
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LEANNA SMITH, individual and as the mother of CR, a minor
Defendant - Appellant:
KATHRYN COFFMAN, MD and ST. JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER, owned and operated by an Arizona Corporation: other Catholic Healthcare West, DBA Dignity Health
Defendant:
STATE OF ARIZONA, TAMMY HAMILTON-MACALPINE, wife, UNKNOWN HAMILTON-MACALPINE, named as: spouse Hamilton-Macalpine/husband and others
Leanna Smith v. State of Arizona, et al
as 14-15390
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEANNA SMITH, individual and as the mother of CR, a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF ARIZONA, TAMMY HAMILTON-MACALPINE, wife, UNKNOWN HAMILTON-MACALPINE, named as: spouse Hamilton-Macalpine/husband and others
Smith v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2013cv00332
Plaintiff:
Leanna Smith
Defendant:
Arizona, State of , Tammy Hamilton-Macalpine , Unknown Hamilton-Macalpine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
