Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
RIECO v. MCCREARY et al
as 2:2019cv01136
Defendant:
RUSSELL WOODS, HAYNES, MCCREARY and others
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
VICTORY v. BERKS COUNTY et al
as 5:2018cv05170
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER DROZACK, KEVIN S. BARNHARDT, C.O. REICHART and others
Plaintiff:
THERESA VICTORY, AMARA SANDERS and SAMANTHA HUNTINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS et al v. LOWE et al
as 2:2017cv02004
Plaintiff:
THOMAS T. THOMAS and ANNA THOMAS
Defendant:
AMARA CARESSE LOWE and ALL OCCUPANTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LOWE v. U.S. BANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2016cv04287
Plaintiff:
AMARA CARESSE LOWE
Defendant:
U.S. BANK, N.A. and COURT OF COMMON PLEAS TRIAL DIVISION - CIVIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOWE v. LSF8 MASTER PARTICIPATION et al
as 2:2016cv04288
Plaintiff:
AMARA CARESSE LOWE
Defendant:
LSF8 MASTER PARTICIPATION and COURT OF COMMON PLEAS TRIAL DIVISION - CIVIL COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOWE v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2016cv04290
Plaintiff:
AMARA CARESSE LOWE
Defendant:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION and COURT OF COMMON PLEAS TRIAL DIVISION - CIVIL COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOWE v. US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION et al
as 2:2016cv04289
Plaintiff:
AMARA CARESSE LOWE
Defendant:
US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and COURT OF COMMON PLEAS TRIAL DIVISION - CIVIL COURT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv03681
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv06998
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
