Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Howell v. Thompson & Markowitz LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00064
Defendant:
Cody Buh and Thompson & Markowitz LLC
Plaintiff:
Amber Howell
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01942
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Daniel Vargas v. Amber Howell, et al
as 18-15513
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL VARGAS
Defendant - Appellee:
AMBER HOWELL, STEVE MCBRIDE, RICHARD GLOECKNER and others
Taylor et al v. Kazmar et al
as 3:2016cv00109
Defendant:
Sherri Cline, Amber Howell, Nicole Kazmar and others
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Markley and Danielle E. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Acosta v. Kurtz et al
as 2:2015cv00232
Plaintiff:
Juan Acosta
Defendant:
Donald Burnette, Romaine Gilliland, Surjest Hardiman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NOT USED
as 2:2014cv01941
Defendant:
Doe Healthcare Providers I-X, Doe Officers, Elko County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vargas v. Howell et al
as 2:2014cv01942
Defendant:
Elko County, Richard Gloeckner, Amber Howell and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Vargas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bajurin et al v. Lennar Reno, LLC
as 3:2014cv00014
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Allen Bajurin, Michon Baker-Faenza, Julie Brehm and others
Defendant:
Lennar Reno, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
A. et al v. Wllden et al
as 5:2013mc00016
Plaintiff:
Henry A., Charles B. , Charlotte B. and others
Defendant:
Michael Wllden , Diane Comeaux, Amber Howell and others
Movant:
National Deaf Academy. LLC
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Green, et al., v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2013cv04786
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Green , Floyd Rodgers, Jr. , Dixie Ross and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
