Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Hari et al v. Singh et al
as 5:2019cv00015
Plaintiff:
Shantilal Hari and Asokkumar Chudasama
Defendant:
Creative Eye International, LLC, 27 Haute Avenue Boutique, Rajiv Singh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
National Labor Relations Board et al v. Dov Charney
as 2:2016cv00797
Petitioner:
American Apparel Inc
Respondent:
Dov Charney
Movant:
National Labor Relations Board
National Labor Relations Board et al v. Dov Charney
as 2:2016mc00016
Petitioner:
American Apparel Inc
Respondent:
Dov Charney
Movant:
National Labor Relations Board
Lane et al v. Singh et al
as 2:2015cv02461
Plaintiff:
Cartel Blue and Robin G Lane
Defendant:
Creative Eye American Apparel, Inc. and Raj Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
In re: Peter Kravitz v. Dov Charney
as 15-56258
Not Classified By Court:
In re: AMERICAN APPAREL, INC., 2014 Derivative Shareholder Litigation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAMMY G. FEDERMAN and PETER KRAVITZ, as Trustee for and on behalf of AAI Litigation Trust,
Defendant / Appellee:
DOV CHARNEY, AMERICAN APPAREL, INC., a Delaware corporation, Nominal Defendant, DAVID DANZIGER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv06240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
BSG Tech LLC v. American Apparel, Inc.
as 2:2015cv01143
Plaintiff:
BSG Tech LLC
Defendant:
American Apparel, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Lane et al v. Singh et al
as 2:2015cv00960
Plaintiff:
Cartel Blue and Robin G Lane
Defendant:
Creative Eye American Apparel, Inc. and Raj Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00722
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jan Willem Hubner et al v. Allan Mayer et al
as 2:2015cv02965
Defendant:
American Apparel, Inc., David Danziger, Robert Greene and others
Plaintiff:
Jan Willem Hubner and Eric Ribner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
