Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 21
David Hammer v. John Ashcroft We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 06-1750
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAVID P. HAMMER
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN D. ASHCROFT, HARLEY LAPPIN, KATHLEEN M. HAWK-SAWYER and others
Not Party - Amicus Curiae: REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS
Amicus Curiae: HOOSIER STATE PRESS ASSOCIATION, HOOSIER STATE PRESS ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION, AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEWSPAPER EDITORS and others
Lane, et al v. Simon, et al
as 05-3284
Plaintiff - Appellee: KATIE LANE and SARAH RICE
Plaintiff: RONALD JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellant: TODD F. SIMON and STEPHEN E. WHITE, in their official and individual capacities
Amicus Curiae: STUDENT PRESS LAW CENTER, THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEWSPAPER EDITORS; THE ASSOCIATED COLLEGIATE PRESS; COLLEGE MEDIA ADVISERS; COLLEGE NEWSPAPER BUSINESS AND ADVERTISING MANAGERS; THE COMMNUNITY COLLEGE JOURNALISM ASSOCIATION; THE FOUNDATIONS FOR INDIVIDUA
In re: Grand Jury
as 04-3139
In Re: In re: Grand Jury Subpoena, Matthew Cooper
Amicus Curiae: Center for Individual Freedom, Dow Jones & Company, Inc., ABC, Inc. and others
In re: Grand Jury
as 04-3140
In Re: In re: Grand Jury Subpoena, Time, Inc.
Amicus Curiae: Center for Individual Freedom, Dow Jones & Company, Inc., ABC, Inc. and others
In re: Grand Jury
as 04-3138
In Re: In re: Grand Jury Subpoena, Judith Miller
Amicus Curiae: Center for Individual Freedom, Dow Jones & Company, Inc., ABC, Inc. and others
In re: Grand Jury, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 04-3138
In Re: In re: Grand Jury Subpoena, Judith Miller
Amicus Curiae For Appellant: Center for Individual Freedom, Dow Jones & Company, Inc., ABC, Inc. and others
: and
Lee, Wen Ho v. DOJ (Jeff Gerth), et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 04-5301
Plaintiff - Appellee: Wen Ho Lee
Defendant - Appellee: United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States Department of Energy and others
Defendant - Appellant: Jeff Gerth
Amicus Curiae For Appellant: Walter Pincus, Washington Post Reporter, The Washington Post Company, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and others
Amicus Curiae For Appellee: Steven J. Hatfill, M.D.
American Civil Liberties Union et al v. Department of Defense et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2004cv04151
Plaintiff: American Civil Liberties Union , Center for Constitutional Rights, Inc. , Physicians for Human Rights and others
Defendant: Central Intelligence Agency , Department of the Army and Federal Bureau Of Investigation
Amicu: Advance Publications, Inc. , American Society of Newspaper Editors , CBS Broadcasting, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act
Ctr Natl Sec Studies, et al v. DOJ
as 02-5254
Plaintiff / Appellee: Center for National Security Studies, American Civil Liberties Union, Electronic Privacy Information Center and others
Not Yet Classified: The Washington Post Company, American Society of Newspaper Editors, National Press Club and others
Defendant / Appellant: United States Department of Justice
Amicus Curiae: Washington Legal Foundation and The Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs
Ctr Natl Sec Studies, et al v. DOJ We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 02-5254
Plaintiff - Appellee: Center for National Security Studies, American Civil Liberties Union, Electronic Privacy Information Center and others
Terminated Party: The Washington Post Company, American Society of Newspaper Editors, National Press Club and others
Defendant - Appellant: United States Department of Justice
Amicus Curiae For Appellant: Washington Legal Foundation and The Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs
Amicus Curiae For Appellee: The Washington Post Company, ABC, Inc., American Society of Newspaper Editors and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?