Cases 11 - 20 of 21,616
Linda Hammell v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp, et al
as 15-2643
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LINDA HAMMELL, individually and as Executrix and Executrix ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Arthur Hammell
Defendant:
CARRIER CORP, TODD SHIPYARDS, individually and for its Todd Combustion Division formerly known as American Standard, Inc., successor-ininterest to Kewanee Boiler Corp., EATON CORP, as successor-in-interest to Cutler-Hammer, Inc. agent ofn/k/a Eaton Electrical, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CBS CORP, a Delaware Corporation, f/k/a Viacom, Inc., individually and as successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation, CRANE CO, successor to Jenkins Valves, Inc. also known as Jenkins Bros., FOSTER WHEELER CORP and others
PRIEST et al v. ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD.
as 2:2014cv02697
Defendant:
CBS CORPORATION, GEORGIA PACIFIC, LLC, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Arbitrator:
MAURICE J. GALLIPOLI
Cross Defendant:
LEON C. PRIEST, SHARON M. PRIEST and JOHN DOE CORPORATIONS 26-50 (fictitious)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
D'Amato SpA v. Pactrans Air & Sea USA et al
as 1:2014cv00046
Defendant:
Pactrans Air & Sea USA and Pactrans Air
Garnishee:
Schweizer Aircraft Corp., Caterpillar Inc., American Standard Trane Ltd and others
Plaintiff:
Fratelli D'Amato SpA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
HAMMELL et al v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al
as 3:2014cv00013
Cross Claimant:
ARVINMERITOR, INC., CBS CORPORATION, CRANE CO. and others
Defendant:
BORG WARNER MORSE TEC, CAMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Cross Defendant:
PNEUMO-ABEX, LLC., STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS, INC., GENERAL CABLE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR HAMMELL and LINDA HAMMELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
MORRIS et al v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL et al
as 2:2013cv06591
Defendant:
JOHN CRANE, INC., TRANE US INC., HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL and others
Plaintiff:
GERALD F. MORRIS and BARBARA MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Shaffer v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2013cv01113
Plaintiff:
Dottie Ann Shaffer
Defendant:
3M Company, American Standard Inc., Arvinmeritor Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Borg-Warner Corporation , Eaton Corporation, General Electric Company and others
Cross_defendant:
Borg-Warner Corporation , 3M Company, American Standard Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
MacQueen v. Union Carbide Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv00831
Plaintiff:
Marguerite MacQueen
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, Acme Engineering & Manufacturing , Aerco International Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
General Electric Company, IMO Industries Inc. and Hyde Windlass Company
Cross_defendant:
General Electric Company , 3M Company, Acme Engineering & Manufacturing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
MacQueen v. Union Carbide Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv00835
Plaintiff:
Marguerite MacQueen
Defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, Acme Engineering & Manufacturing , Aerco International Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
IMO Industries Inc. and Hyde Windless Company
Cross_defendant:
IMO Industries Inc. , 3M Company, Acme Engineering & Manufacturing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
BLAKENEY et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 2:2013cv60005
Plaintiff:
DONNA C. OGDEN BLAKENEY , ANTHONY OGDEN , ALAN R. OGDEN and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS, CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Davis et al v. Ace Hardware Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv01185
Defendant:
BorgWarner Morse Tec Inc., Georgia Pacific LLC, Honeywell International Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Harry A. Davis and Madonna S. Davis
Cross Defendant:
Peerless Industries
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
