Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
El v. Stewart et al
as 3:2019cv06012
Plaintiff:
Amir Hassan El
Defendant:
Matthew White, Camas Police Dept, Mitch Lackey and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Vazquez et al v. Fifth Avenue Men's Suits LLC. et al
as 1:2017cv02923
Plaintiff:
Elodia Vazquez
Defendant:
Fifth Avenue Men's Suits LLC. , Designer Men's Suits Inc. and Amir Hassan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Nejad, et al v. Lynch
as 16-2218
Petitioner:
FARAHNAZ KHODABAKHSH NEJAD, AMIR HASSAN AMIRMAZAHERI and AIDA AMIR MAZAHERI
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
Hassan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2016cv01190
Plaintiff:
Amir Hassan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hassan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2016at00656
Plaintiff:
Amir Hassan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hassan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2013at01129
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Amir Hassan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hassan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2013cv02019
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Amir Hassan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hassan v. Imperial Sugar Company et al. DO NOT DOCKET IN 4:11cv3457. CASE IS CONSOLIDATED UNDER 4:11cv3250.
as 4:2011cv03457
Plaintiff:
Amir Hassan
Defendant:
Imperial Sugar Company, John C. Sheptor and Harold P. Mechler
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Dow Chemical Canada Inc v. HRD Corporation
as 4:2010mc00138
Plaintiff:
Dow Chemical Canada Inc
Defendant:
HRD Corporation
Counter_claimant:
HRD Corporation
Counter_defendant:
Dow Chemical Canada Inc and The Dow Chemical Company
Movant:
Abbas Hassan , Amir Hassan , Aman Hassan and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
