Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Richard-Allerdyce et al v. Union Institute and University et al
as 1:2023cv00796
Plaintiff:
Diane Richard-Allerdyce, Karen Baird, Carol Barrett Sargent and others
Defendant:
Union Institute and University, The Board of Trustees of Union Institute and University, Edgar L Smith, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Brinkman et al v. Place et al
as 3:2023cv00886
Plaintiff:
Chad Brinkman, Karissa Hoersten and Maureen Rentz
Defendant:
Amos J. Place, Jeffrey E. Rex, Detective Nathan Huebner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Amos, Sr. v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03485
Plaintiff:
Brian James Amos, Sr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Amos v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv04651
Plaintiff:
Anthony Amos
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Amos v. C. R. Bard et al
as 2:2021cv01733
Defendant:
C. R. Bard and Davol, Inc
Plaintiff:
Jerry W. Amos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Amos v. Davol Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00461
Plaintiff:
Lynda Amos
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc. and Davol Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Homes-Amos v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv00071
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR Bard Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Patricia Homes-Amos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Akarah v. Ohio Department of Rehab & Correction et al
as 2:2020cv06051
Defendant:
Franklin Medical Center and Ohio Department of Rehab & Correction
Plaintiff:
Amos D. Akarah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Amos v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 2:2019cv04803
Defendant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Plaintiff:
Ronald R Amos
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
