Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv08287
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv02363
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00867
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
AmSurg Glendale, Inc., et al v. Glendale Surgery Partners, et al
as 17-5459
Petitioner - Appellee:
AMSURG GLENDALE, INC. and AMSURG CORP.
Respondent - Appellant:
GLENDALE SURGERY PARTNERS and RICHARD WEISE, M.D.
Glendale Surgery Partners et al v. AmSurg Glendale, Inc et al
as 3:2017cv00049
Petitioner:
Glendale Surgery Partners
Respondent:
AmSurg Glendale, Inc. , AmSurg Corp. and Does
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
Glendale Surgery Partners et al v. AmSurg Glendale, Inc et al
as 2:2016cv05841
Respondent:
AmSurg Corp., AmSurg Glendale, Inc. and Does
Petitioner:
Glendale Surgery Partners
Glendale Surgery Partners et al v. AmSurg Glendale, Inc et al
as 2:2016mc00097
Respondent:
AmSurg Corp., AmSurg Glendale, Inc. and Does
Petitioner:
Glendale Surgery Partners
AmSurg Glendale, Inc. et al v. Glendale Surgery Partners et al
as 3:2016cv00862
Petitioner:
AmSurg Glendale, Inc. and AmSurg Corp.
Respondent:
Glendale Surgery Partners, Richard Weise, R. Phillip Doss and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009
Dalitz et al v. AmSurg Corp. et al
as 2:2012cv02218
Plaintiff:
Douglas Dalitz and Randy Gray
Intervenor_plaintiff:
USA and State of California
Defendant:
AmSurg Corp., Gastroenterology Associates Endoscopy Center, LLC, Redding Gastroenterology and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Haralson v. Amsurg Corp. et al
as 6:2011cv01334
Plaintiff:
Shawn Haralson
Defendant:
Amsurg Corp. and Nancy Dean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
