Cases 1 - 10 of 235
Martin v. Brott et al
as 0:2024cv00964
Plaintiff:
Julyen Alozno Martin
Defendant:
Joel Brott, Sherburne Jail Commander, Jail Captains and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaddis v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv01348
Plaintiff:
Amy Gaddis
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Ritter v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
Amy Ritter
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Yorktallman v. Trustee, et alia, of Tamara Renee Yorktallman et al
as 0:2023cv03303
Plaintiff:
Tamara Renee Yorktallman
Defendant:
Trustee, et alia, of Tamara Renee Yorktallman, State of Minnesota, The, Molly Mulcahy Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv02134
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv02753
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Radford v. Charter Communications Holdings, LLC
as 0:2023cv02688
Plaintiff:
Amy Sue Radford
Defendant:
Charter Communications Holdings, LLC doing business as Spectrum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Alexander et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02616
Plaintiff:
Melissa Alexander, Michael Wayne Allen, Alan Alsop and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Allen et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02634
Plaintiff:
Zackerie Allen, Nicholas Amatuzzo, Edwin Among and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Wilson et al v. Minnesota, State of et al
as 0:2023cv02197
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Jacob Wilson and M. J. W.
Defendant:
Minnesota, State of, Judge Michelle Lawson, Clay, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
