Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Bui et al v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv01095
Plaintiff:
Dang Bui and Than Le
Defendant:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
DANG v. GEICO SECURE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2023cv02311
Plaintiff:
PHAT DANG
Defendant:
GEICO SECURE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Cortes v. The City of Philadelphia et al
as 2:2021cv00115
Defendant:
Police Officer Leible, Police Officer Myers, Police Officer Tirodo and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Cortes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DANG v. PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2017cv05516
Plaintiff:
LUKE A. DANG
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY and ALL NAMED INSURORS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BROWN-DICKERSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2015cv04940
Plaintiff:
TANYA BROWN-DICKERSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, NICHOLAS CARRELLI and HENG DANG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN-BEY v. CCP OF PHILA. CTY. et al
as 2:2014cv06162
Plaintiff:
WILLIE BROWN-BEY
Defendant:
CCP OF PHILA. CTY., U.S.A. CORPORATION, CITY OF PHILA., MUNICIPAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DANG v. THE PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2014cv02010
Plaintiff:
TONY DANG
Defendant:
THE PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, MICHELLE FARRELL and GIORLA LOUIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DANG et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2012cv05089
Plaintiff:
YAU TO DANG and BICSAN SANDY DANG
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DANG v. ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE
as 2:2012cv04709
Plaintiff:
PHUC HONG DANG
Defendant:
ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
