Cases 1 - 10 of 186
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ad Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
TRANBARGER v. ANDERSON POLICE DEPT.
as 1:2023cv02293
Plaintiff:
DALE C. TRANBARGER
Defendant:
ANDERSON POLICE DEPT.
Rogers v. Anderson et al
as 3:2023cv01006
Plaintiff:
Willie Rogers
Defendant:
Nikolos Anderson, Matthew Henson, Kimberly Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
COMMON CAUSE INDIANA et al v. CITY OF ANDERSON COMMON COUNCIL et al
as 1:2023cv01022
Plaintiff:
COMMON CAUSE INDIANA, ANDERSON-MADISON COUNTY NAACP BRANCH 3058, LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF INDIANA and others
Defendant:
CITY OF ANDERSON COMMON COUNCIL and MADISON COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
