Cases 21 - 30 of 330
Bingham v. Anderson
as 1:2023cv00654
Plaintiff:
Ta'Kuan K Bingham
Defendant:
David E. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prepared Food Photos, Inc. v. Andersons Neck, LLC
as 3:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Prepared Food Photos, Inc. and ADLIFE Marketing & Communications Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Andersons Neck, LLC doing business as Andersons Neck Oyster Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Anderson v. GlobalTel Link
as 3:2023cv00245
Plaintiff:
Micah Anderson
Defendant:
GlobalTel Link
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wishom v. Anderson et al
as 3:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
Christian Amadi Wishom
Defendant:
Superintendent Anderson and Captain Mac
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Yamaucii
as 3:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Micah Anderson
Defendant:
Hiroshi Yamaucii
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00559
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Anderson v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2022cv00758
Plaintiff:
Serena anderson
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, General R.V. Center, Inc. and REV Recreation Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Arroyo v. Vergakis et al
as 2:2022cv00505
Plaintiff:
Amos Arroyo
Defendant:
John Vergakis, John Doe, John Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowser v. Anderson
as 1:2022cv01247
Plaintiff:
Michael Bowser
Defendant:
D. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Clarke et al
as 2:2022cv00355
Plaintiff:
John David Anderson, III
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Leslie J. Fleming, Beth E. Cabell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
