Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Britton v. Gaston et al
as 4:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
Meika DeSean Britton
Defendant:
Milton Gaston, Anderson Johnson, Daphne Gallion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Chisholm v. Johnson et al
as 3:2019cv00929
Defendant:
J. Lamar Shaw, Cynthia Griffin, Deputy Warden Chaz White and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Dewayne Chisholm
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas v. Hinds County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2019cv00894
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Hinds County Sheriff's Department, Belinda Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Lavonne Douglas
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rawls v. Walls et al
as 3:2019cv00839
Defendant:
Cyathia Griffin, A. Green, Lavonne Walls and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley Ellis Rawls
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. Johnson
as 3:2019cv00551
Petitioner:
Darren Fields
Respondent:
Anderson Johnson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McLin v. Johnson
as 3:2019cv00479
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Anderson Johnson
Plaintiff:
Nicholas McLin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Grady v. Johnson
as 2:2019cv00040
Plaintiff:
Isiah Grady, III
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Anderson Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gates v. Johnson et al
as 1:2019cv00035
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Mississippi and Anderson Johnson
Petitioner:
Chris Gates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shannon v. State of Mississippi
as 5:2018cv00095
Plaintiff:
MacArthur Shannon
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
State of Mississippi and Warden Anderson Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 2:2018cv00115
Plaintiff:
ANDERSON JOHNSON
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
